How to report hate speech under BNS and IT Act
Tired of viral hate clips? Learn how to use BNS Sections 196 and 299 to report hate speech and ensure the police take action using the BNSS framework.
Tired of viral hate clips? Learn how to use BNS Sections 196 and 299 to report hate speech and ensure the police take action using the BNSS framework.
You are 19, and your college batch’s Discord server or a local Telegram group is suddenly flooded with a viral clip. It is a local leader or an influencer calling for a total economic boycott of a specific community, or perhaps using dehumanising slurs to describe a religious group. You want to report it, but you have seen the headlines: cases like the "goli maro" speeches or "corona jihad" broadcasts often end up dismissed by courts. It feels like the law only works for the loud, not the civil. But here is the reality: most cases fail because of poor documentation and a lack of understanding of the "Harm Test" established by the Supreme Court. If you know which buttons to push and which sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to cite, you stop being a bystander and start being a safeguard for your community.
In India, hate speech is not a single defined crime but a cluster of offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, which replaced the IPC in July 2024. To make a report stick, you need to identify which specific line was crossed.
This is the big one (formerly Section 153A IPC). It penalises anyone who promotes enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., by words (spoken or written), signs, or visible representations. The key here is that the act must be "prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony."
Formerly Section 295A IPC, this covers deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings. The Supreme Court in Ramji Lal Modi v. State of UP (1957) clarified that this does not cover every insult, but only those calculated insults that carry a potential to disrupt public order.
If someone circulates a report or rumour intended to create fear or alarm, or incites one community against another, they are liable under Section 353 (formerly Section 505 IPC). This is often the most effective section for reporting viral fake news that targets specific demographics.
You might wonder why some high-profile cases get dismissed. In Amish Devgan v. Union of India (2020), the Supreme Court distinguished between "free speech" and "hate speech." The court held that hate speech is an effort to marginalise individuals based on their membership in a group, which reduces their quality of life. More importantly, in Shaheen Abdulla v. Union of India (2023), the Supreme Court directed all States and UTs to register suo motu (on their own motion) cases against hate speech, regardless of the religion of the speaker, calling it vital to preserve the "secular fabric" of India. If a police officer refuses to register your FIR, they are technically in contempt of these Supreme Court directions.
For digital hate speech, the Information Technology Act, 2000 also comes into play. While Section 66A was struck down, Section 69A allows the government to issue blocking orders for content that threatens public order.
Reporting hate speech requires a mix of digital forensic-saving and formal legal filing. Do not just report the post on Instagram and move on; that rarely leads to legal accountability.
Before the uploader deletes the post or the platform takes it down, you must create a permanent record.
If the hate speech is online, your first stop is the Cyber Crime reporting portal.
For local incidents or viral content with high impact, a physical FIR is more powerful.
If the Station House Officer (SHO) refuses to entertain your complaint:
After 15 days of filing your complaint, if there is no update, use the RTI Act to demand the status.
Browse all civic-action guides
Even with a perfect screen recording and a copy of the BNS, the system has built-in friction points designed to exhaust you. Here is how to navigate the most common dead ends:
The "Sanction to Prosecute" Trap (Section 223 BNSS): This is the biggest hurdle. For crimes like promoting enmity (Section 196 BNS), the police cannot technically start a trial in court without "prior sanction" from the State Government or the Central Government.
The "It’s Just an Opinion" Gaslighting: An officer might tell you, "Beta, it’s just a video, ignore it." They are banking on you not knowing the "Harm Test."
The "Jurisdiction" Loop: If you report a video made in Mumbai while you are in Delhi, the local police might try to send you away.
The Platform Dead-end: Reporting to Instagram or X (formerly Twitter) often results in an automated "This does not violate our standards" message.
Copy-paste this, fill the brackets, and take two printouts. Get one stamped as your 'Received' copy.
To, The SHO/In-charge, [Name of Police Station/Cyber Cell], [City, State].
Subject: Complaint regarding commission of offences under Sections 196, 299, and 353 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
Respected Sir/Ma'am,
I am writing to report a [video/post/audio clip] circulated on [Platform Name, e.g., WhatsApp/Instagram] by [User Handle/Name/Phone Number] on [Date and Time].
The content in question explicitly [describe the speech: e.g., calls for the economic boycott of X community / uses dehumanising slurs against Y religion]. This act:
As per the Supreme Court’s directions in Shaheen Abdulla v. Union of India (2023), police authorities are mandated to take suo motu action against hate speech to preserve the secular fabric of the country.
I have attached the digital evidence (screenshots and a link to the cloud folder containing the screen recording). I request you to register an FIR immediately as per the mandate of Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. (2014).
Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Phone Number] [Your Address]
To, Public Information Officer (PIO), Office of the Commissioner of Police, [City].
Subject: Application under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005.
Regarding FIR No: [Your FIR Number] registered at [Police Station Name] on [Date].
Please provide the following information:
I have attached the ₹10 fee in the form of a [Postal Order/Online Receipt].
1. Can I report hate speech anonymously? You can report anonymously through the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). However, for a full-scale BNS FIR that leads to a trial, the police usually require a complainant's statement. If you fear for your safety, mention this in your complaint and ask for protection under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018.
2. What if the person who spoke is a powerful politician? The law remains the same. In fact, the Supreme Court in Shaheen Abdulla (2023) specifically noted that the "stature of the speaker" should not stop the police from acting. If the local SHO is scared to act, your best bet is to file a "Private Complaint" before a Magistrate under Section 223 of the BNSS.
3. Is it hate speech if I share the video to show how bad it is? Context matters. If you share it with a caption like "Look at this disgusting hate speech, we need to stop this," you lack the mens rea (criminal intent) to promote enmity. However, avoid "hate-quoting" where you repeat the slur in your own caption, as that can sometimes trigger automated filters or be misinterpreted by the law.
4. How much does it cost to file these reports? Filing an FIR is free. Filing a complaint on the Cyber Cell portal is free. An RTI costs ₹10 (plus photocopy charges). You do not need a lawyer to file a complaint or an FIR, though having one helps if the case goes to the High Court.
5. What is the timeline for action? Under the IT Rules, platforms must remove "public order" threats within 24–72 hours of a government order. For the police, an investigation should ideally be completed within 60–90 days, but because of the "Sanction to Prosecute" requirement, hate speech trials can take years. Your goal is often to get the content down and the person's digital footprint flagged.
6. Can I be sued for defamation for reporting someone? No, as long as you are reporting in "good faith" to a lawful authority. Section 356 of the BNS (Defamation) has an exception for accusations made in good faith to persons having lawful authority over the person complained against.
7. Does the law cover hate speech against LGBTQ+ individuals? While Section 196 BNS specifically lists "religion, race, caste, community, sex, place of birth, residence, language," the term "community" and "sex" are being increasingly interpreted by High Courts to include gender identity and sexual orientation. Even if Section 196 is contested, Section 353 (Public Mischief) can still apply.
You can report anonymously through the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in). However, for a full-scale BNS FIR that leads to a trial, the police usually require a complainant's statement. If you fear for your safety, mention this in your complaint and ask for protection under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018.
The law remains the same. In fact, the Supreme Court in *Shaheen Abdulla (2023)* specifically noted that the "stature of the speaker" should not stop the police from acting. If the local SHO is scared to act, your best bet is to file a "Private Complaint" before a Magistrate under Section 223 of the BNSS.
Context matters. If you share it with a caption like "Look at this disgusting hate speech, we need to stop this," you lack the *mens rea* (criminal intent) to promote enmity. However, avoid "hate-quoting" where you repeat the slur in your own caption, as that can sometimes trigger automated filters or be misinterpreted by the law.
Filing an FIR is free. Filing a complaint on the Cyber Cell portal is free. An RTI costs ₹10 (plus photocopy charges). You do not need a lawyer to file a complaint or an FIR, though having one helps if the case goes to the High Court.
Under the IT Rules, platforms must remove "public order" threats within 24–72 hours of a government order. For the police, an investigation should ideally be completed within 60–90 days, but because of the "Sanction to Prosecute" requirement, hate speech trials can take years. Your goal is often to get the content down and the person's digital footprint flagged.
No, as long as you are reporting in "good faith" to a lawful authority. Section 356 of the BNS (Defamation) has an exception for accusations made in good faith to persons having lawful authority over the person complained against.
RTI templates, FIR scripts, real escalation ladders — the same kind of thing you just read. Sundays only. No spam.
We don't share your email. Unsubscribe any time.
Get ₹50,000 for your technical education. Learn how to apply for AICTE's Pragati, Saksham, and Swanath scholarship schemes for the 2026-27 academic year on the NSP portal.
Check if your college is legal. Learn how to download the AICTE APH 2024-27 and verify mandatory norms for faculty, labs, and student grievances.
Found a broken link or outdated data on a government portal? Learn how to find and message the Web Information Manager (WIM) to get it fixed fast.
Ever wonder how new state laws actually affect you? Learn how to find, read, and decode State Legislative Briefs to track bills before they become law.