📚Civic Action

How to Report Hate Speech by Politicians (and Why it is Hard)

Ever wondered why FIRs against politicians for hate speech often go nowhere? Learn about 'Sanction' laws and the playbook to hold leaders accountable.

HowToHelp Editorial
9 min read
#hate speech law india#Brinda Karat case#Section 218 BNSS#Anurag Thakur speech case#how to report hate speech#BNS 196 sanction#FIR against politicians

The "Goli Maaro" Case: Why the Courts Stayed Quiet

You are scrolling through your feed and see a clip from a 2020 election rally. A politician is leading a chant that feels like a direct threat to a specific community. You think, "This is illegal, right?" So did CPM leader Brinda Karat. She went to court to get an FIR registered against two MPs for their speeches during the Delhi riots era. But in 2024, the Supreme Court upheld a lower court's refusal to act. The reason? A legal gatekeeper called "Sanction." If you have ever wondered why some people seem "above the law" when they speak, it is usually because of this specific procedural hurdle.

What the law actually says

In India, "Hate Speech" isn't a single defined term in our law books, but it is punished under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (which replaced the IPC on July 1, 2024).

  • Section 196 BNS: Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc.
  • Section 197 BNS: Punishing imputations or assertions prejudicial to national integration.
  • Section 299 BNS: Deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings.

Normally, under the landmark Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. (2014) judgment by the Supreme Court, the police are required to register an FIR if a complaint discloses a "cognizable offence." You can read more about How to file an FIR (and what to do if police refuse).

However, there is a massive exception. Under Section 218 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 (formerly Section 196 of the CrPC), no court can "take cognizance" of offences like BNS Section 196 or 299 unless the Central or State Government gives its formal "Sanction" (permission).

In the Brinda Karat & Anr vs. State of NCT of Delhi case, the Delhi High Court (2022) and subsequently the Supreme Court (2024) ruled that even a Magistrate cannot order the police to register an FIR under Section 175 of the BNSS (formerly 156(3) CrPC) for these specific crimes without that government permission. The logic? The law wants to protect public servants and politicians from "frivolous" or "politically motivated" cases. The downside? It makes it incredibly hard for a regular citizen to hold a powerful person accountable for inflammatory speech.

Step-by-step playbook: Holding them accountable

Step 1: Secure the "Digital Evidence"

Before you even think about the police station, you need proof. Hate speech on social media or at rallies often gets deleted or edited once a controversy starts.

  • Screen Record: Do not just screenshot. Use a screen recorder to show the URL, the profile, and the video playing.
  • Download the High-Res Video: Use tools to save the original broadcast if possible.
  • Note the Metadata: Write down the exact date, time, and location of the speech. If it was a physical rally, find out who organized it.
  • Verify the Transcript: Write down the exact words used in the original language (Hindi/English/Regional) and provide an honest translation. If it is online, use the Cyber Crime reporting portal to flag the content immediately.

Step 2: Identify the BNS Sections

You do not need to be a lawyer, but your complaint will be taken more seriously if you name the specific sections:

  • If they are inciting violence or enmity between religions: Section 196 BNS.
  • If they are insulting a religion with "malicious intent": Section 299 BNS.
  • If they are making statements that could lead to a riot: Section 191 BNS.

Step 3: File a formal complaint (Section 173 BNSS)

Go to the local police station where the speech occurred or where you viewed it (this is called a Zero FIR).

  • What to bring: Two copies of your written complaint and a pen drive/CD with the evidence.
  • Expected Timeline: The police might conduct a "Preliminary Inquiry" (max 14 days under BNSS) to see if a case is made out.
  • If it fails: If the Station House Officer (SHO) refuses to take the complaint, send it via Registered Post to the Superintendent of Police (SP) or Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP). This creates a paper trail that the court will later demand.

Step 4: The Sanction Request (The Hard Part)

Since the courts will not act without "Sanction" for BNS 196 or 299, you have to ask the government for it yourself if the police are sitting on the case.

  • The Target: Write to the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs (for Central matters/UTs like Delhi) or the State Home Department.
  • The Content: Attach your police complaint and evidence. Formally request "Sanction for prosecution under Section 218 of the BNSS."
  • Timeline: There is no fixed timeline in the law, which is a major failure point. However, the Supreme Court in Subramanian Swamy vs. Manmohan Singh (2012) suggested that the sanctioning authority should decide within 3 months.

Step 5: File an RTI to track the Sanction

If you do not hear back within 30 days, use the RTI Act to keep the pressure on.

  • What to ask: "Provide the current status of my application for sanction dated [Date]. Provide copies of all file notings regarding this application."
  • Link: File an RTI online to ensure there is an official record of the government's delay.

Step 6: Move the Magistrate (Section 175 BNSS)

If the police still do not file an FIR and you have proof that the government is ignoring your request, you can file an application before the Metropolitan Magistrate.

  • What to do: Ask the court to direct the police to register an FIR.
  • The Hurdle: Be prepared for the Magistrate to cite the Brinda Karat judgment. You will need to argue that the speech is so egregious that it doesn't just fall under Section 196 (which needs sanction) but also under other sections like Section 352 BNS (Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace) which do not require government sanction.

Browse all civic-action guides

Where it usually breaks

The biggest roadblock isn't the law—it’s the "Sanction Wall." Even if you have a 4K video of a politician calling for violence, the police will likely cite Section 218 of the BNSS (formerly Section 196 CrPC). They will tell you they cannot proceed without "Prior Sanction" from the State or Central Government. Since the government is often run by the same party as the politician you are reporting, this sanction is rarely granted.

Failure Mode 1: The "Non-Cognizable" Brush-off The officer might claim the speech doesn't "incite" enough to be a cognizable offence and will only record a Non-Cognizable Report (NCR).

  • Workaround: Remind them of the Supreme Court's directions in Shaheen Abdulla vs. Union of India (2023), where the court ordered Suo Motu (on their own motion) action against hate speech regardless of the religion of the speaker. If they still refuse, send your complaint via Registered Post to the Superintendent of Police (SP) under Section 173(4) of the BNSS.

Failure Mode 2: The Evidence Certificate Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 (which replaced the Evidence Act), any social media clip you provide is "electronic evidence." Police often reject these by saying they aren't "authenticated."

  • Workaround: You must submit a Section 63 BSA Certificate (formerly 65B). This is just a signed declaration by you stating that the phone/laptop used to find the video is yours and the content hasn't been tampered with.

Failure Mode 3: The "Wait for Elections" Excuse If you report a politician during a rally, police might tell you to "complain to the Election Commission (ECI) instead."

  • Workaround: The ECI’s Model Code of Conduct (MCC) is an administrative tool, not a criminal one. Filing an ECI complaint is good for getting a rally cancelled, but it does not replace an FIR for criminal hate speech. Do both.

Templates / script

Template 1: Formal Complaint to the SHO

Subject: Complaint under Sections 196 and 299 of the BNS, 2023 regarding Hate Speech.

To, The Station House Officer, [Name of Police Station], [City/District]

Sir/Madam, I am writing to report a cognizable offence committed by [Name of Politician/Speaker] on [Date] at [Location/Social Media Platform].

The accused stated: "[Insert exact quote or Hindi transcript]."

These words promote enmity between groups on the grounds of [Religion/Race/Caste] and are a deliberate attempt to outrage religious feelings, punishable under Section 196 and Section 299 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.

As per the Supreme Court’s mandate in Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. (2014) and Shaheen Abdulla vs. Union of India (2023), you are requested to register an FIR immediately. I have attached a pen drive containing the video evidence and a certificate under Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

Regards, [Your Name & Phone Number] [Date]

Template 2: Script for Talking to the Police

Officer: "Yeh political mamla hai, hum bina permission (sanction) ke FIR nahi kar sakte." You: "Sir, sanction is required for the Court to take cognizance under Section 218 BNSS, but it does not stop the Police from registering an FIR and starting an investigation. The Supreme Court in the Shaheen Abdulla case said that any delay in filing hate speech cases will be treated as Contempt of Court. Please give me a receipt for my complaint."

FAQs

1. Can I file a complaint for a speech I saw on YouTube but happened in another state? Yes. You can file a Zero FIR at your local police station. Under the BNSS, the police are required to record the information and then transfer it to the relevant station where the speech actually took place. Don't let them tell you "it's out of our jurisdiction."

2. Does the "Sanction" rule apply to everyone? No. Section 218 of the BNSS specifically applies to offences like BNS 196 (promoting enmity) and 299 (outraging religious feelings). If the politician also used criminal intimidation (Section 351 BNS) or provoked a riot (Section 191 BNS), those often do not require the same level of government permission to start an investigation.

3. Is there a fee for filing this complaint? No. Filing a criminal complaint or an FIR is absolutely free. If anyone asks for a "process fee" or "documentation charge," they are asking for a bribe. You are also entitled to a free copy of the FIR once it is registered under Section 173(2) of the BNSS.

4. What if the politician is speaking during an election campaign? In addition to the police, you should report them via the cVIGIL app managed by the Election Commission of India. While the police handle the BNS crimes, the ECI can ban the politician from campaigning for 48–72 hours for violating the Model Code of Conduct.

5. Can I remain anonymous while reporting? Technically, an FIR requires a complainant’s name. However, you can report "Hate Content" anonymously on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. For physical rallies, you can send a signed complaint via registered post to the Police Commissioner, which creates a paper trail without you having to stand in a police station.

6. How long does the government take to give "Sanction"? There is no strict legal deadline in the BNSS, which is why cases like Brinda Karat vs. State of NCT of Delhi drag on for years. However, the Supreme Court has previously suggested that authorities should decide on sanction requests within 3 to 4 months. If they sit on it, you can file an RTI to the Home Department asking for the "daily progress report" on your sanction request.

Sources

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can I file a complaint for a speech I saw on YouTube but happened in another state?

Yes. You can file a **Zero FIR** at your local police station. Under the BNSS, the police are required to record the information and then transfer it to the relevant station where the speech actually took place. Don't let them tell you "it's out of our jurisdiction."

2. Does the "Sanction" rule apply to everyone?

No. Section 218 of the BNSS specifically applies to offences like BNS 196 (promoting enmity) and 299 (outraging religious feelings). If the politician also used criminal intimidation (Section 351 BNS) or provoked a riot (Section 191 BNS), those often do not require the same level of government permission to start an investigation.

3. Is there a fee for filing this complaint?

No. Filing a criminal complaint or an FIR is absolutely free. If anyone asks for a "process fee" or "documentation charge," they are asking for a bribe. You are also entitled to a free copy of the FIR once it is registered under **Section 173(2) of the BNSS**.

4. What if the politician is speaking during an election campaign?

In addition to the police, you should report them via the **cVIGIL app** managed by the Election Commission of India. While the police handle the BNS crimes, the ECI can ban the politician from campaigning for 48–72 hours for violating the Model Code of Conduct.

5. Can I remain anonymous while reporting?

Technically, an FIR requires a complainant’s name. However, you can report "Hate Content" anonymously on the [National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal](https://cybercrime.gov.in). For physical rallies, you can send a signed complaint via registered post to the Police Commissioner, which creates a paper trail without you having to stand in a police station.

📮

One civic-action playbook a week

RTI templates, FIR scripts, real escalation ladders — the same kind of thing you just read. Sundays only. No spam.

We don't share your email. Unsubscribe any time.

How to Report Hate Speech by Politicians in India · HowToHelp